tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5371132400241072988.post2492533721359157054..comments2012-10-16T02:22:45.319-07:00Comments on TONIGHT: Proponent v. Opponent: Summary of the tripJesse Alamahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18300729364134604326noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5371132400241072988.post-71780000567632197362011-07-28T01:42:22.788-07:002011-07-28T01:42:22.788-07:00Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the comment! The collabora...Hi Daniel,<br /><br />Thanks for the comment! The collaborative aspect of Opponent in the particle rules is exactly what Hodges complains about when he discusses dialogical logic in his paper "Dialogue Foundations", <i>Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society</i> Supplementary volume 75 (2001): 17-49 (a companion to a piece by Erik C. W. Krabbe which follows immediately). There Hodges offers some suggestions of how the Opponent could be made more opposing rather than collaborating, though I don't know if anyone has ever tried to implement these ideas into a Lorenzen-type dialogue system.<br /><br />Otherwise, in general the only ways that have been considered to modify the particle rules have been either to add new ones (for new operators), or to interdefine the connectives, e.g., negation in terms of implication and falsum.Sara L. Uckelmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14716054827293611237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5371132400241072988.post-11004104917137424152011-07-27T22:22:51.720-07:002011-07-27T22:22:51.720-07:00Can you say more about your collaboration idea? To...Can you say more about your collaboration idea? To me the particle rules are the common ground between Proponent and Opponent, whereas structural rules can tip the balance one way or another. Try playing some dialogue games following the skeletal ruleset, which consists only of particle rules and minimal structural rules (Proponent goes first, moves alternate between players). Or try playing with a ruleset where Proponent is restricted in some way that Opponent is not.<br /><br />If you have a concrete proposal for a new rule (or rules), please do tell me. It's not too difficult to extend the site with new rules.<br /><br />Thanks for checking out our work!Jesse Alamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18300729364134604326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5371132400241072988.post-76146646939036827652011-07-27T15:33:24.206-07:002011-07-27T15:33:24.206-07:00Congratulations, your blog and the dialogue websit...Congratulations, your blog and the dialogue website are fantastic! I found it very useful to understand how dialogical logic works. <br />However, I have a question (maybe a beginners one). What happens when particle rules are modified? My problem is that the Opositor's rules seem more like a collaboration than an attack. Is it possible to have a more aggressive Opositor? Thanks.danielvazquezhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00381027670208970435noreply@blogger.com